Review



172 yb cd4  (fluidigm)


Bioz Verified Symbol fluidigm is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol fluidigm manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    fluidigm 172 yb cd4
    172 Yb Cd4, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 20 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/172 yb cd4/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 20 article reviews
    172 yb cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    fluidigm 172 yb cd4
    172 Yb Cd4, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/172 yb cd4/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    172 yb cd4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    fluidigm anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb fluidigm rrid ab 2924892
    Figure 1. Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, CD4CD8), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, <t>CD4+CD8+),</t> and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4+/ CD8/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see STAR Methods). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).
    Anti Mouse Cd4 Rm4 5 172 Yb Fluidigm Rrid Ab 2924892, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb fluidigm rrid ab 2924892/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb fluidigm rrid ab 2924892 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    fluidigm anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb
    Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, <t>CD4</t> − CD8 − ), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4 + CD8 + ), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4 +/− CD8−/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see ). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).
    Anti Mouse Cd4 Rm4 5 172 Yb, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse cd4 rm4 5 172 yb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    fluidigm 168 er cd45 fluidigm 3147003b 30 f11 147 sm cd4 fluidigm 3172003b rm45 172 yb cytoplasmic
    Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, <t>CD4</t> − CD8 − ), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4 + CD8 + ), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4 +/− CD8−/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see ). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).
    168 Er Cd45 Fluidigm 3147003b 30 F11 147 Sm Cd4 Fluidigm 3172003b Rm45 172 Yb Cytoplasmic, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/168 er cd45 fluidigm 3147003b 30 f11 147 sm cd4 fluidigm 3172003b rm45 172 yb cytoplasmic/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    168 er cd45 fluidigm 3147003b 30 f11 147 sm cd4 fluidigm 3172003b rm45 172 yb cytoplasmic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    fluidigm anti pe pe001 165 ho x fluidigm 3165015b anti apc apc003 176 yb x fluidigm 3176007b cd3e 145 2c11 172 yb ebioscience 14 0031 86 201172a cd4 rm4
    Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, <t>CD4</t> − CD8 − ), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4 + CD8 + ), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4 +/− CD8−/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see ). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).
    Anti Pe Pe001 165 Ho X Fluidigm 3165015b Anti Apc Apc003 176 Yb X Fluidigm 3176007b Cd3e 145 2c11 172 Yb Ebioscience 14 0031 86 201172a Cd4 Rm4, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pe pe001 165 ho x fluidigm 3165015b anti apc apc003 176 yb x fluidigm 3176007b cd3e 145 2c11 172 yb ebioscience 14 0031 86 201172a cd4 rm4/product/fluidigm
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti pe pe001 165 ho x fluidigm 3165015b anti apc apc003 176 yb x fluidigm 3176007b cd3e 145 2c11 172 yb ebioscience 14 0031 86 201172a cd4 rm4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 1. Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, CD4CD8), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4+CD8+), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4+/ CD8/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see STAR Methods). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation.

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, CD4CD8), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4+CD8+), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4+/ CD8/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see STAR Methods). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb FLUIDIGM RRID:AB_2924892.

    Techniques: Cell Differentiation, Transformation Assay, Marker

    Figure 4. A two-step segmentation process (A and B) Since one-step segmentation in higher dimensions can lead to significant dispersal of cells along the projected trajectory in CD4/CD8 space (e.g. assigning DN cells to points far along the trajectory, supplemental information Figure S4), segmentation was first performed in 2D. Panel in A shows the trajectory upon the density plot in CD4/CD8 space, leading from DN to DP, and splitting toward SP states. The time equation was solved separately for the DN + DP phase and each SP phase. Sequentially, each segment was sub-segmented using more markers (8 dimensions) as illustrated in B. A zoomed portion of the trajectory calculated in A is shown, with cells between two pairs of points colored differently (green and pink). The grid size for sub-segmentation was proportionally chosen with respect to the relative time spent in the original segment (Dt), potentially resulting in the addition of more or less time points.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation.

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. A two-step segmentation process (A and B) Since one-step segmentation in higher dimensions can lead to significant dispersal of cells along the projected trajectory in CD4/CD8 space (e.g. assigning DN cells to points far along the trajectory, supplemental information Figure S4), segmentation was first performed in 2D. Panel in A shows the trajectory upon the density plot in CD4/CD8 space, leading from DN to DP, and splitting toward SP states. The time equation was solved separately for the DN + DP phase and each SP phase. Sequentially, each segment was sub-segmented using more markers (8 dimensions) as illustrated in B. A zoomed portion of the trajectory calculated in A is shown, with cells between two pairs of points colored differently (green and pink). The grid size for sub-segmentation was proportionally chosen with respect to the relative time spent in the original segment (Dt), potentially resulting in the addition of more or less time points.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb FLUIDIGM RRID:AB_2924892.

    Techniques:

    Figure 5. Real-time axis validation (A) In-vivo validation was performed by intrathymic, adoptive transfer of DN1-3 (CD4CD8CD44+/CD25+/) cells from CD45.1 mice (B6SJL) into CD45.2 (C57BL) mice (left and center panel). Thymi were harvested 1, 3, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days post-transfer and stained with antibodies against CD45.1, CD45.2, CD8, CD4, and other developmental markers (center). Further analysis was performed by gating the CD45.1+/CD45.2- cells. Each time point presents Thymi from two mice, and the experiment was repeated twice. (B) CD8 (Black) and CD4 (Red) expression levels were calculated by tracking the CD45.1+/CD45.2- gated cells. The expression levels for CD4 and CD8 were separately normalized to the median fluorescence of all the cells from all the time points. Black broken vertical lines separate here (and in later figures) between the DN, DP, and SP phases as indicated on top. (C) CD4 and CD8 profiles as constructed by our method for real-time axis inference averaged across 12 mice. (D) Wishbone pseud-temporal ordering captures the major stages in T cell development but scales differently than the real-time axis.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation.

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Real-time axis validation (A) In-vivo validation was performed by intrathymic, adoptive transfer of DN1-3 (CD4CD8CD44+/CD25+/) cells from CD45.1 mice (B6SJL) into CD45.2 (C57BL) mice (left and center panel). Thymi were harvested 1, 3, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days post-transfer and stained with antibodies against CD45.1, CD45.2, CD8, CD4, and other developmental markers (center). Further analysis was performed by gating the CD45.1+/CD45.2- cells. Each time point presents Thymi from two mice, and the experiment was repeated twice. (B) CD8 (Black) and CD4 (Red) expression levels were calculated by tracking the CD45.1+/CD45.2- gated cells. The expression levels for CD4 and CD8 were separately normalized to the median fluorescence of all the cells from all the time points. Black broken vertical lines separate here (and in later figures) between the DN, DP, and SP phases as indicated on top. (C) CD4 and CD8 profiles as constructed by our method for real-time axis inference averaged across 12 mice. (D) Wishbone pseud-temporal ordering captures the major stages in T cell development but scales differently than the real-time axis.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb FLUIDIGM RRID:AB_2924892.

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, In Vivo, Adoptive Transfer Assay, Staining, Expressing, Construct

    Figure 6. The real-time axis is able to unfold regions of biological significance (A-C) CD69, IDU, and cPARP real-time trajectory profiles along the CD4 SP and CD8 SP paths (left and center panels respectively, averging data from 12 mice.), and along Wishbone pseudotime trajectory (right, one mouse). Black broken vertical lines separate between DN, DP, and SP phases as in Figure 5. Black arrows in A indicate the second elevation in CD69 expression which is spread over several days along the real-time axis as opposed to the relative condensed portion it occupies in the Wishbone trajectory.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation.

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. The real-time axis is able to unfold regions of biological significance (A-C) CD69, IDU, and cPARP real-time trajectory profiles along the CD4 SP and CD8 SP paths (left and center panels respectively, averging data from 12 mice.), and along Wishbone pseudotime trajectory (right, one mouse). Black broken vertical lines separate between DN, DP, and SP phases as in Figure 5. Black arrows in A indicate the second elevation in CD69 expression which is spread over several days along the real-time axis as opposed to the relative condensed portion it occupies in the Wishbone trajectory.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb FLUIDIGM RRID:AB_2924892.

    Techniques: Expressing

    Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, CD4 − CD8 − ), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4 + CD8 + ), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4 +/− CD8−/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see ). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dimensionality reduction and segmentation (A) Cell differentiation in the thymus. Scatterplot of cells in representative mouse (yellow) depicts a snapshot of the maturation process, with naive cells entering the thymus in the double-negative state (DN, CD4 − CD8 − ), sequentially differentiating into double-positive cells (DP, CD4 + CD8 + ), and finally acquiring one of the single-positive fates (SP, CD4 +/− CD8−/+). Arcsine transformation was used here and for gating purposes (see ). (B) Five simulated markers. Profiles are shown without adding noise. Each time step (dt = 0.01), 100 new cells were added and assigned with t = 0. Initial marker values for each cell were chosen from a normal distribution centered at the values plotted at t = 0, with a SD of 0.1. Noise was also added to the cycle time length of each cell (after which the cell was removed) which was chosen from a normal distribution centered at T = 1 with a SD of 0.1. Division and apoptosis were not implemented in these simulations, which were run until reaching the steady state. (C) Trajectory course calculated upon density plot of two markers in B. Starting and ending points are predetermined (upper and lower crosses respectively). Anchors (corresponding symbols) are placed in positions of local maxima. The trajectory (red circles) travels upon the crest connecting path edges and anchors. Panel to the right magnifies the last position obtained and illustrates how new position coordinates are chosen; new coordinates are chosen from nearest neighbors surrounding the previous position on a grid, where progression in the direction of the previous position is forbidden (optional new coordinates are surrounded by black circles). Default choice is for the neighbor in the direction aligned toward the next anchor (moment). Deviation is permitted only if the difference in densities between the default neighbor and some other permitted neighbor exceeds a predetermined value, thereby justifying a detour. See methods for more details. (D) Trajectory calculation in five dimensions. The principle is similar to calculation in two dimensions (see text), allowing for trajectory dynamics in any region where at least one of the markers changes. The calculated trajectory is projected here upon a two-dimensional density plot, with anchors and crosses representing landmarks as in C. Note that anchors are placed near, but not in the exact position, of the global maxima in two dimensions (see methods for superfluous anchor removal in higher dimensions).

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb , FLUIDIGM , RRID: AB_2924892 ..

    Techniques: Cell Differentiation, Transformation Assay, Marker

    Real-time axis validation (A) In-vivo validation was performed by intrathymic, adoptive transfer of DN1-3 (CD4 − CD8 − CD44+/−CD25+/−) cells from CD45.1 mice (B6SJL) into CD45.2 (C57BL) mice (left and center panel). Thymi were harvested 1, 3, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days post-transfer and stained with antibodies against CD45.1, CD45.2, CD8, CD4, and other developmental markers (center). Further analysis was performed by gating the CD45.1+/CD45.2- cells. Each time point presents Thymi from two mice, and the experiment was repeated twice. (B) CD8 (Black) and CD4 (Red) expression levels were calculated by tracking the CD45.1+/CD45.2- gated cells. The expression levels for CD4 and CD8 were separately normalized to the median fluorescence of all the cells from all the time points. Black broken vertical lines separate here (and in later figures) between the DN, DP, and SP phases as indicated on top. (C) CD4 and CD8 profiles as constructed by our method for real-time axis inference averaged across 12 mice. (D) Wishbone pseud-temporal ordering captures the major stages in T cell development but scales differently than the real-time axis.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Real-time axis validation (A) In-vivo validation was performed by intrathymic, adoptive transfer of DN1-3 (CD4 − CD8 − CD44+/−CD25+/−) cells from CD45.1 mice (B6SJL) into CD45.2 (C57BL) mice (left and center panel). Thymi were harvested 1, 3, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days post-transfer and stained with antibodies against CD45.1, CD45.2, CD8, CD4, and other developmental markers (center). Further analysis was performed by gating the CD45.1+/CD45.2- cells. Each time point presents Thymi from two mice, and the experiment was repeated twice. (B) CD8 (Black) and CD4 (Red) expression levels were calculated by tracking the CD45.1+/CD45.2- gated cells. The expression levels for CD4 and CD8 were separately normalized to the median fluorescence of all the cells from all the time points. Black broken vertical lines separate here (and in later figures) between the DN, DP, and SP phases as indicated on top. (C) CD4 and CD8 profiles as constructed by our method for real-time axis inference averaged across 12 mice. (D) Wishbone pseud-temporal ordering captures the major stages in T cell development but scales differently than the real-time axis.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb , FLUIDIGM , RRID: AB_2924892 ..

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, In Vivo, Adoptive Transfer Assay, Staining, Expressing, Fluorescence, Construct

    A two-step segmentation process (A and B) Since one-step segmentation in higher dimensions can lead to significant dispersal of cells along the projected trajectory in CD4/CD8 space (e.g. assigning DN cells to points far along the trajectory, <xref ref-type=Figure S4 ), segmentation was first performed in 2D. Panel in A shows the trajectory upon the density plot in CD4/CD8 space, leading from DN to DP, and splitting toward SP states. The time equation was solved separately for the DN + DP phase and each SP phase. Sequentially, each segment was sub-segmented using more markers (8 dimensions) as illustrated in B. A zoomed portion of the trajectory calculated in A is shown, with cells between two pairs of points colored differently (green and pink). The grid size for sub-segmentation was proportionally chosen with respect to the relative time spent in the original segment ( Δ t ), potentially resulting in the addition of more or less time points. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A two-step segmentation process (A and B) Since one-step segmentation in higher dimensions can lead to significant dispersal of cells along the projected trajectory in CD4/CD8 space (e.g. assigning DN cells to points far along the trajectory, Figure S4 ), segmentation was first performed in 2D. Panel in A shows the trajectory upon the density plot in CD4/CD8 space, leading from DN to DP, and splitting toward SP states. The time equation was solved separately for the DN + DP phase and each SP phase. Sequentially, each segment was sub-segmented using more markers (8 dimensions) as illustrated in B. A zoomed portion of the trajectory calculated in A is shown, with cells between two pairs of points colored differently (green and pink). The grid size for sub-segmentation was proportionally chosen with respect to the relative time spent in the original segment ( Δ t ), potentially resulting in the addition of more or less time points.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb , FLUIDIGM , RRID: AB_2924892 ..

    Techniques:

    The real-time axis is able to unfold regions of biological significance (A-C) CD69, IDU, and cPARP real-time trajectory profiles along the CD4 SP and CD8 SP paths (left and center panels respectively, averging data from 12 mice.), and along Wishbone pseudotime trajectory (right, one mouse). Black broken vertical lines separate between DN, DP, and SP phases as in <xref ref-type=Figure 5 . Black arrows in A indicate the second elevation in CD69 expression which is spread over several days along the real-time axis as opposed to the relative condensed portion it occupies in the Wishbone trajectory. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The real-time axis is able to unfold regions of biological significance (A-C) CD69, IDU, and cPARP real-time trajectory profiles along the CD4 SP and CD8 SP paths (left and center panels respectively, averging data from 12 mice.), and along Wishbone pseudotime trajectory (right, one mouse). Black broken vertical lines separate between DN, DP, and SP phases as in Figure 5 . Black arrows in A indicate the second elevation in CD69 expression which is spread over several days along the real-time axis as opposed to the relative condensed portion it occupies in the Wishbone trajectory.

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb , FLUIDIGM , RRID: AB_2924892 ..

    Techniques: Expressing

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: From pseudo to real-time dynamics of T cell thymic differentiation

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105826

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Anti-Mouse CD4 (RM4-5)-172 Yb , FLUIDIGM , RRID: AB_2924892 ..

    Techniques: Recombinant, Conjugation Assay, Software